Twelve locations, twelve statements — and no two with the same rates.
Store networks grow, and the terminal contracts grow with them — just rarely in the same direction: acquired locations, legacy terms, individually negotiated rates. Central management needs structure: one contract, one reporting view, one rollout standard, a cleanly configured merchant account. We compare which providers genuinely support multi-location structures — free and independent.
What makes the difference in your business
One master agreement instead of organic sprawl
In many store networks, every register pays differently — not because anyone ever decided it, but because it grew that way. Often not even under the same pricing model: one store settles at a blended rate, another by card type, a third is still on the previous owner’s contract. A master agreement resets that: same rates, same terms, one point of contact. And with the combined volume of all locations, you negotiate in a different league than any single store on its own.
Reporting that makes locations comparable
If every location settles with a different provider, the monthly comparison is manual labor: different formats, settlement logics, cut-off dates. A central dashboard shows every store by the same scheme — revenue, transactions, average ticket, down to the individual terminal if you want. Only then are the numbers actually comparable. And only then does a location running out of line show up on the third of the month — not at year-end.
Rollout: new locations in days, not weeks
At a new opening, the terminal is rarely the most expensive trade — but often the last one finished. Providers with multi-location experience set up new stores under the existing master agreement: pre-configured devices, central master data, no new credit check, no new negotiation. The terminal arrives ready to operate, and on opening day the register is an item that was ticked off long ago.
Merchant account structure: one payout, readable per store
One merchant account for everything, one per location, or a structure with sub-accounts — this decision determines how your accounting works. Consolidated payouts save postings but make per-store reconciliation tedious; separate payouts keep every location clean but fragment your cash flow. Well-configured providers can do both at once: one payout, but referenced per store — the daily close on site balances, and headquarters still sees everything.
One TSE per register, not per company: Germany’s Cash Register Security Ordinance counts devices, not locations. Run fifty registers and you’re managing fifty certified technical security systems, expiry dates and replacements included. Rolled out centrally, that’s one process — maintained individually, it’s fifty.
Send us the terminal statements from two or three of your locations — that’s all it takes to start. We’ll put them side by side, bring the rates onto a common denominator, and calculate what a master agreement across all stores would be worth.
Get your comparison